Now that Mitt Romney has won in all the states he has ties to shouldn’t he mostly be emphasizing his record?

massachusetts jobs
Brenda M asked:

Mitt Romney handily won all the states he has a big history with; Massachusetts, Michigan, & Utah; his competition can stop saying Mitt has a bad record there.

Mitt needs to focus on his history with these states & with his private sector business rather than to use vague criticism that McCain or Huckabee aren’t conservative enough. We need to hear the specifics.

Mass – Mitt turned a $3 BILLION deficit into a $700 MILLION surplus w/out raising taxes, brought 60,000 new jobs after the mass exodus preceeding him, the TOP 25% of students get to go to state colleges or universities for free, he got us healthcare using the conservative approach. In Utah- Winter Olympics. Also focus on his private sector life.

Mitt needs to be specific & focus on the economy. We’re in a recession! Jobs are getting scarce especially in certain areas, business are leaving the U.S., forclosures are astronomical. Mitt has a great record to run on, but people need specifics.
McCain admits he knows nothing about economics. He has been in charge of a border state for 25 years, but doesn’t have a completed border. McCain called us ****** for not supporting his amnesty plan. McCain called Christians agents of intolerance.

Huckabee raised taxes and commuted the sentence of murderers. Huckabee wants to make the Constitution more God friendly.

The statement “not conservative enough” is too vague. People don’t get what you mean by that. People however, do understand when you list a litany of differences and your own good record.
Now that Mitt can prove that he has overwhelming support of his constituents; his critics can stop saying negative things about his record.
I’m voting my conscience. I will not suport a candidate that does not jive with my core values or calls me names just because he’s the nomination. I’m stick with Romney as long as he’s in it. I may even write his name on my ballot if he’s not on it in November.






2 Responses to 'Now that Mitt Romney has won in all the states he has ties to shouldn’t he mostly be emphasizing his record?'

  1. sociald - February 21st, 2010 at 1:44 am

    The problem McCain won in blue states, and Huckabee won in bible belt states. I think if huckabee would have been out it would be a much more even race.

    I honestly want someone who isnt the same old same old washington fixture in office this next time. Which means I dont want McCain and Hillary.
    Obama is inspiring to listen too, its just a few of his policies I have a hard time agreeing with.
    Mitt is clearly far and away the most well equipped to deal with the economy, which is supposedly voters number one issues.
    Every time McCain is asked about economic issues and about his experience, he just brings up people who support him and that he was on the commerce committe but he never answers the question.

  2. larry p - February 21st, 2010 at 6:15 am

    Now that Mitt has less than one third of the vote, compared to McCain, your arguement falls away. I agree that Mitt know more about economics, but the Presidency is more than that.
    I would not have picked McCain as my first choice, but I firmly believe he is man enough and he is the man to go with now.


Leave a Reply